So I'm doing my usual news reconnaissance and what do I see? Articles like this at CNN and the BBC respectively:
CNN
Officials confirm 'credible but unconfirmed' 9/11 threat
BBC
9/11: US warns of 'credible' anniversary threat
ABC News
U.S. Citizen Linked To Al Qaeda Terror Plot on 9/11 Anniversary
Both stories alleged that an unspecified but specific and credible threat has been identified that possibly targets in New York or Washington. As I was composing this post, the initial stories were beefed up with "reports" of three individuals behind this alleged threat. An official said the plot was believed to involve three individuals, including a U.S. citizen,with two others said to be from tribal areas of Pakistan all possibly traveling through Dubai. U.S. officials believed the threat was a vehicle laden with explosives, but "the intelligence picture is not completely formed," the official said. "Not enough is known about the potential operatives and their plotting."
One article goes on to say that the threat is believed to entail a vehicle bomb, but "we cannot rule out other means," a U.S. official said. A senior law enforcement official involved in briefings about the matter told CNN Justice Department Producer Terry Frieden that his best information is that the three individuals had not yet entered the United States.
The information came in around noon Wednesday, one official said.
Other than that the articles are peppered with the usual deliberately enigmatic phrases: "Official(s)", "Source(s)", "Authorities", "Intelligence and Law-Enforcement Officials" and "Multiple Sources". Some of the article comments however are brilliant and a number are actually calling them on their shite and stating this is fear mongering and prep for a false flag. Here's some samples I grabbed before they were sanitised and the paid trolls were deployed:
GERMANEONE
10:03 PM EDT
Sep 08, 2011
oh sorry, I was to distracted by the economic meltdown to be distracted by this B.S terror threat that is no threat at all. I guess the poll numbers dropped too low or there is a draconian bill that needs to be passed. They found this evidence in the Bin Laden raid when they killed some poor guy and said it was Bin Laden. Hence the burial at sea. Everyone knows Bin Laden died a long time ago. Now it's a big deal? Silly Gov't scare tactics are for kids.So why now? Polls, prevent protests at the 9/11 anniversary or maybe they will sneak something tomorrow and this will keep the public distracted. Keep your eyes on the real news not the mainstream.
dphiz
5 Minutes ago
This is probably total propaganda. I think they'll carry out a false flag attack, just to reinforce this whole "Everyone is a terrorist" "If you see something, Say Something" 1984 ideaology. Also, it will boost Obama's rating, just as it did for George Bush Jnr.
PrezOdumbo
WARNING:
The US government is getting ready to stage a false flag attack on the United States (again) and blame it on middle class white guys who talk about The Constitution, the 2nd amendment, and 9/11 being an inside job.
Fascists are nothing if not predictable and this is becoming ridiculously transparent to see being played out as it is. What these actions belie is the depth of their psychopathy and just how truly stupid and gullible they believe the masses to be. I keep thinking and hoping that these twisted bastards are not as desperate and arrogant to pull off another sick massacre, but when I see an article like this it causes some trepidation to say the least. Worst of all is that they think that by propagating this out in the media they are covering and distancing themselves from the proceedings. Also, why does the government announce that they've uncovered a threat publicly, when discretion and secrecy would serve better in tracking down possible terrorists? Why advertise unless you have an ulterior motive, and when since do you have an unconfirmed threat that is also considered credible? Do they even proofread the shit they contrive and post?
This is what I denote as true terror chatter before a false flag is executed, and mimics much the same that was heard from nonspecific sources shortly after Osama bin Laden's death was faked earlier this year. According to unidentified intelligence sources, documents were recovered from the Osama bin Laden compound allegedly stated that there would be attacks on or around July 4th and/or the anniversary of September 11th. It has long been proven that Al Qaeda are a pseudo-gang creation of the CIA and their leader Osama has been dead since December of 2001. Since the attacks during 9/11 were an inside job primarily committed by Israel and US, then what remains is that if there's any chatter or threats of incidents emanating from dubious and unknown quarters, it is a setup for yet another synthetic terror incident. In other words, fake Al Qaeda + fake terror threats from the genuine perpetrators = false flag massacre 2011. Time will tell and as always, I hope I'm wrong with this reasoned prognostication, but if I'm not, remember you heard it here.
Remain vigilant all.
* UPDATE! *
* I wrote this as a reply at Thirteenth Monkey but I think it bears repeating for my readers here.
I should also point out that the night of September 11th will have a full moon. We all know how satanoids particularly relish that and factor it in with their death rituals. I don't like the mounting number of occult and politically opportunistic convergences I'm seeing on this date. The only thing to stop it is to keep doing what we're doing and keep pumping out the truth. It's monkey wrenching their plans by shaking their confidence that they can get away with it again. Also, that much pressure is sure to cause them to make mistakes and hasty missteps, and all they need do is make that one critical error that is caught full out. That one red-handed error that can't be reversed or dismissed with lies, and then the whole show is undone like dominoes.